Episode 276
What Research Says About AI Avatars in Learning
Should AI avatars replace human presenters?
In part two of this research series on The Visual Lounge, host Matt Pierce is joined again by TechSmith Senior Market Researcher Stephanie Warnoff to discuss the latest findings from TechSmith's research on AI avatars in instructional video.
Building on episode 275 about AI voices, this conversation explores how different on-screen presenter styles affect viewer perception and information retention.
The study compares multiple formats, including human presenters, AI avatars, and alternative visual approaches. You’ll learn about common misconceptions teams have about avatars, why viewer reactions often differ from stated preferences, and where avatars may help or hurt depending on context.
Learning points from the episode include:
- 00:00 – 01:40 Intro
- 01:40 – 03:45 What surprised Stephanie most in her findings on AI avatars
- 03:45 – 05:20 The five video snippets used during the study
- 05:20 – 08:27 How are perspectives around AI changing?
- 08:27 – 11:25 When to use avatars, and when not to use avatars
- 11:25 – 13:35 The impact of avatars on learning
- 13:35 – 15:17 Stephanie’s advice on implementing AI avatars into work
- 15:17 – 17:03 Stephanie's tips to people who are reluctant to use AI avatars
- 17:03 – 18:29 Questions that Stephanie would like to answer in future research
- 18:29 – 19:42 Matt's take on the research
- 19:42 – 21:14 Stephanie's advice for people interested and how to get involved with TechSmith research
- 21:14 – 21:59 Stephanie's final take
- 21:59 Outro
Important links and mentions:
- Connect with Stephanie: research@techsmith.com
- Learn more about the study in this blog post: https://www.techsmith.com/blog/ai-voices-avatars-in-training-videos/
- Check out part one of this research series, episode 275, on AI voices: https://the-visual-lounge.captivate.fm/episode/275-ai-voices-impact-on-learning/
Transcript
So my final take is that in using AI avatars in your videos,
Speaker:you really need to know your audience and know your purpose of your video. So
Speaker:if you are creating a video that is long,
Speaker:instructional screen based, it's okay to have some flexibility to try
Speaker:and add an AI avatar. But if you're creating a personal
Speaker:or sensitive or small team recording, just an update,
Speaker:it's not appropriate to replace a human presenter with AI avatars. So make sure that
Speaker:you know your audience, know your message and act appropriately in your
Speaker:videos. Good morning, good evening, good
Speaker:afternoon, wherever you are and wherever you're watching. My name is Matt Pierce, Sosa Visual
Speaker:Lounge and we are back with more AI research. That's right. If you
Speaker:listen to or watch the last episode, we talked about AI voices,
Speaker:AI voice generation and some of the impact there, some what people thought about
Speaker:them, how it can affect learning. Today we're going the next step further. We're going
Speaker:to be talking about AI avatars. So you might be on the fence here. You
Speaker:might be like, I don't know, I don't know about AI avatars. You might be
Speaker:on the side of you love them because they make your work faster and easier
Speaker:and you can produce more content. Or you might be on the other side where
Speaker:you're like, no way, I will never use an AI avatar. I don't like them.
Speaker:Whatever it might be, there is information here that you might find valuable
Speaker:based on research. So let's go ahead and jump back in and introduce our
Speaker:guest today, Stephanie Warnhoff. She's a market researcher for
Speaker:TechSmith and she has done this great research study. So Stephanie, Stephanie,
Speaker:welcome back to the Visual Lounge. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much.
Speaker:Good afternoon, Matt. Yeah, good afternoon. Well, we're going to dive in because there's
Speaker:so much here I think that's worth covering and I think this is so
Speaker:everyone for context, this is part of our AI research. We'll post the link in
Speaker:the context below so you can find that blog post in the PDF. So
Speaker:Stephanie, as you started going part through this research and you started learning from what
Speaker:people were saying, particularly with AI avatars, we what surprised you
Speaker:most in particular about what you found. So
Speaker:we ran basically the same, similar type of study. We
Speaker:had five different videos that we showed each
Speaker:individual participant. One. So one was using a human
Speaker:avatar in picture, in picture, so small circle kind of taking up, you
Speaker:know, a quarter of the screen. Then we had the human full screen which was
Speaker:more like half and half. Then we had an AI avatar that was also
Speaker:picture in Picture an AI avatar that was full screen, which is about half the
Speaker:screen. And then we had an audio visualizer, which is a
Speaker:feature that you can include in your Camtasia videos. But it is basically a still
Speaker:image with a bubble around it, for lack
Speaker:of a better word, that shows kind of the waveforms when someone is speaking. So
Speaker:it's not a moving video, but it is movement and engaging for your
Speaker:eyes. So we had those five videos and I think the thing that
Speaker:surprised me the most was that on the AI avatar side
Speaker:that participants felt like the smaller picture in picture avatar was
Speaker:actually higher quality than the full screen AI avatar. I think
Speaker:I was thinking, okay, bigger is better. So the bigger the avatar is,
Speaker:the bigger the human is, the higher quality they're going to think it is. And
Speaker:that was just not correct. It was not correct in terms of what they
Speaker:felt like for high quality. And it wasn't, it wasn't
Speaker:the biggest. When we talk about learning retention, which we'll get to later on,
Speaker:but 31% more participants felt that the smaller AI
Speaker:avatar was either good or excellent quality versus that full screen
Speaker:AI avatar. And we did have an open ended comment section there as well that
Speaker:let us know that basically with that larger on screen avatar, the tiny
Speaker:motions that make AI avatars look, I mean, kind of fake
Speaker:were more noticeable. So like the facial expressions, the kind of
Speaker:imperfect eye contact, kind of robotic sounding voice was more
Speaker:noticeable because that avatar was taking up more of the screen real estate
Speaker:on the screen. So although it's the most surprising thing,
Speaker:once I looked at the data and read through those comments, I could completely understand
Speaker:why people focused on felt that way. Yeah, well, we actually
Speaker:have the, the snippets of those. I think we're gonna. Let's play those now
Speaker:since you've described them so we can see them now. If you're a podcast listener,
Speaker:you can't see obviously through the podcast. I recommend you go check out our YouTube
Speaker:channel or on the Visual Lounge. We've been starting to post the videos from YouTube
Speaker:so you can check it out there. Anything we should know before we watch this
Speaker:beside beyond what you've already said, Stephanie? I don't think so.
Speaker:But just remember that each participant only saw one of these videos. This is kind
Speaker:of a montage of all five smashed together. So you'll notice kind of the cuts
Speaker:of, you know, or so seconds. It'll flip to another one. So this is not
Speaker:exactly what they saw, but it's one part of what they saw. We
Speaker:get the benefit of seeing all of them. But yeah, participants only saw a month,
Speaker:so. Well, let's go ahead and watch that. Google search results can be
Speaker:a bit much sometimes. A simple search like what is the best
Speaker:sunscreen? Is full of ads and profit driven biases.
Speaker:Google search results can be a bit much sometimes. A simple search like
Speaker:what is the best sunscreen? Is full of ads and profit driven
Speaker:biases. Google search results can be a bit much sometimes.
Speaker:A simple search like what is the best sunscreen? Is full of ads and
Speaker:profit driven biases. Google search results can be a bit
Speaker:much. A simple question like what is the best sunscreen? Is
Speaker:full of ads and profit driven biases. Google search results can
Speaker:be a bit much. A simple question like what is the best
Speaker:sunscreen? Is full of ads and profit driven biases.
Speaker:Okay, so we've got a few, few different options there. Obviously there's a
Speaker:human in there. There's the audio
Speaker:visualizer with the rings around it of a still image. Got lots to look
Speaker:at. Now one thing, Stephanie, you've worked on some of our other research projects
Speaker:as well. And in past research we've seen like, you know,
Speaker:most people prefer a real human over some type of
Speaker:AI avatar. Yet when we actually did this test, you know,
Speaker:this experiment here, this research, it looks like learners actually
Speaker:rated AI avatars equally or as
Speaker:equal professional kind of level as those as the humans.
Speaker:So one thing that stands out to me is that I think it was like
Speaker:92% of viewers rated avatar videos as professional
Speaker:and they would watch another video from that creator.
Speaker:What's the explanation between kind of that gap of what we've seen in past research
Speaker:and now how people are kind of judging the quality of the overall
Speaker:videos that are with avatars in them? Any sense of what's
Speaker:changing out there for people? You know, we deal with this a lot
Speaker:in research. The difference between what people either say or what they
Speaker:say they're going to do versus what they either actually do or their actual behavior
Speaker:shows. So there's research that says that the best predictor of future
Speaker:behavior is actually your past behavior. Right? So if you say I'm going
Speaker:to go to the gym every day this year, but actually the better predictor would
Speaker:be how many days out of the week did you go to the gym last
Speaker:year is a better predictor of actually what you're going to do in the future.
Speaker:So we have trouble reconciling this often with research. You know, do we, do we
Speaker:listen to what they say or do we watch what they do? And for
Speaker:this example, I'M not saying that people were incorrect when they said what they
Speaker:prefer, but I do want to point out that although this video viewer research is
Speaker:not old by any stretch, there has been huge
Speaker:advancements in AI between. Even when we ran that study at the end of
Speaker:2024 and this study that we're sharing now at the beginning of 2026, I
Speaker:mean, 18 months, things have changed so much.
Speaker:And so saying that they did prefer a human visual presenter at
Speaker:that time versus actual higher quality AI avatar
Speaker:presenter during the study is a little bit off. So they're
Speaker:not exactly comparing the AI avatars versus each other in this new study.
Speaker:Right. I mentioned they only saw one of these videos. They're not comparing the human
Speaker:to the AI, they're seeing one in isolation and basically had to
Speaker:evaluate the professionalism without comparing to what everyone else was seeing. So when
Speaker:they actually view a video and are trying to learn from it, they look at
Speaker:the screen content, they look at the size of the avatar, the voice that was
Speaker:used, you know, the facial movements, the tone of voice, everything. So this
Speaker:entire package is what viewers are evaluating when they say a video is
Speaker:professional. And I will point out that actually in this study, almost
Speaker:50% of them did not know it was an AI avatar. So the
Speaker:knowledge of it being an AI avatar didn't really affect their
Speaker:perception certainly of the professionalism or their perception of the quality.
Speaker:Yeah, which is, which is super interesting that people couldn't tell for whatever, for
Speaker:whatever reason. But you're right, the gap between
Speaker:2024 and beginning here of 2026 is,
Speaker:it's huge for AI. And so I think, yeah, it does
Speaker:make sense that maybe people's perceptions are changing. I know when you look at the
Speaker:quality of avatars or the quality of the technology, what it's able to
Speaker:produce is just a different scale, Right?
Speaker:Absolutely. So in the research,
Speaker:one of the questions or I guess we alluded to or looked at was
Speaker:when to use an avatar and when not to use avatars. Because I think this
Speaker:is important because I think a lot of us who are in the learning and
Speaker:development space, not everything is as clear cut as like just use
Speaker:it, or maybe it's not use it. We're looking for that guidance. We're still trying
Speaker:to figure these norms out of what makes sense. Are there any
Speaker:highlights from the research about when we should use avatars, not use
Speaker:avatars, any impact on maybe or
Speaker:perceived impact on trust when we are or are not using them?
Speaker:Yeah, that's a great question. We pretty much specifically did address that exact
Speaker:fact in the survey. So there was a question that basically said,
Speaker:when is it acceptable? In what style of video is it acceptable to use an
Speaker:AI avatar to you? And we got pretty clear answers on that. So in
Speaker:our study, our viewers were most accepting of an AI avatar in
Speaker:an instructional or a video that heavily featured screen
Speaker:based content. They were least comfortable when a personal
Speaker:presence was needed, like a welcome video from a CEO
Speaker:or a team update video, for example. Now, we didn't specifically ask
Speaker:about trust, but you can kind of infer that if they found an AI
Speaker:avatar acceptable, they would be like more okay with that video
Speaker:overall. So if an AI avatar is used in a video that was
Speaker:meant to distribute maybe personal or sensitive information, it could
Speaker:really turn off your viewers. So our advice here at least is to be
Speaker:intentional about the message of the videos, know your audience, and
Speaker:kind of proceed, you know, with that information in mind.
Speaker:Well, if I could follow up a little bit on that. It also seems like
Speaker:the thing that you said earlier that 50% of people didn't know
Speaker:when something was an avatar also maybe plays into
Speaker:that kind of trust issue. If I don't know it's an avatar
Speaker:and all of a sudden it's delivered maybe a very serious message that's
Speaker:maybe inappropriate for an avatar that causes potentially real issues,
Speaker:right? Yeah, absolutely. I mean, there's the
Speaker:knowledge of whether it's an AI avatar to begin with and then there's the message
Speaker:or the content that's trying to be delivered. So that's two separate factors there. And
Speaker:you're right. If they don't necessarily know it's an avatar, it can
Speaker:definitely seem sneaky, for lack of a better word.
Speaker:If you're trying to, you know, use AI as a blanket for every human
Speaker:visual presenter and every style of video and your viewers. And
Speaker:especially if it's something like I mentioned, like a sensitive topic or a small team
Speaker:update that's really going to make people, you know, sour on
Speaker:your video because it's just not the appropriate metric. You should have spent, you
Speaker:know, maybe an extra several minutes or however long it would take to be a
Speaker:visual presenter in that video to kind of humanize that video quite a bit more.
Speaker:Yeah, I'm waiting for the news articles to talk about the organization.
Speaker:Hopefully never. But you know, use uses the AI to
Speaker:avatar to lay off the workers or major
Speaker:changes. We don't look forward to that day. But obviously there are some impacts
Speaker:here. One, one of the impacts I think my audience is really interested in
Speaker:is the learning aspect. Right. So You've got lots of
Speaker:ways you could present content for people to learn from, particularly
Speaker:from what you found in this research. Was there anything interesting about the type of
Speaker:presentation of humans versus avatars and kind of
Speaker:overall effectiveness in being able to perform a task?
Speaker:Yeah, I mean, I kind of hit on this a little bit earlier too. But
Speaker:in terms of the actual learning retention, the differences between four of the five
Speaker:video types were very slight. Between the human full screen, human
Speaker:picture in picture, the avatar full screen, and the audio visualizer.
Speaker:We basically asked them kind of a pop quiz to answer a question that they
Speaker:saw in the video. And between those four types of video, there was only really
Speaker:a 3% difference in the amount of people that got the correct answer. So the
Speaker:difference was very slight. But one of them really excelled above those, and that
Speaker:is the avatar picture in picture, which actually performed 13%
Speaker:better than any of those other four examples. So
Speaker:I talked about this a little bit at the beginning, but people really rated that
Speaker:video as higher quality. But alongside that, they got, you
Speaker:know, the information that they received from that video. They were able to, you know,
Speaker:internalize and answer a question later on in the survey more correctly with
Speaker:that style of video. So like I said, they also had that
Speaker:video also had the highest number of people that felt it was
Speaker:professional, and it also had a higher learning retention. That's kind of like two stars
Speaker:for that style of video, for sure. Yeah. And, you know, I
Speaker:can think about different research from a different era. Right. Not looking
Speaker:at avatars at all, but about on camera presence and, um,
Speaker:you know, I think one thing that's always been interesting to me that with on
Speaker:camera presence and again, not avatars, the research typically shows that
Speaker:performance doesn't change, but people have a preference for it. Right. They
Speaker:like having a person there or face there, but it's never.
Speaker:It's, you know, usually a picture in picture, not all the time on screen. So
Speaker:there are some elements that I think we could probably translate. But it is interesting
Speaker:that they actually still perform better on the task. It's one of those ones. I'm
Speaker:like, Stephanie, let's do more research on that. Let's find somebody to help us do
Speaker:that, because that's super interesting about why that might be. And I know
Speaker:we don't have answers for that, but something I'm definitely, definitely curious about.
Speaker:And it does lead to the question of, like, as people are
Speaker:leaning in here, maybe using more
Speaker:avatars or want to use more avatars in their work,
Speaker:is there advice that you can give us? Obviously, you're not an instructional
Speaker:designer, you're not creating training videos. But from the research that you're seeing,
Speaker:any advice that you could give people to help them use them maybe more strategically
Speaker:or more effectively, I would say. Just
Speaker:overall, and I think I said this with the AI voice research as well, is
Speaker:if you have the flexibility and the buy in, you should try
Speaker:it. It's not a you should never use this or you should always
Speaker:use this. But my advice is to give it a try, kind of see
Speaker:how it works out for you and your audience. And this study proves to me
Speaker:that viewers are willing to watch videos with AI avatars,
Speaker:accept the style, and really believe that the qual is sometimes good or even better
Speaker:than with a human presenter. So for most cases, using an ar,
Speaker:excuse me, AI avatar will not harm your video. It could even help
Speaker:increase the information that your viewers retain. Now, there is an exception to
Speaker:that which I touched on earlier, which is if your video is personal
Speaker:or sensitive or something that really does need a human touch, we would not
Speaker:recommend using an AI avatar for that situation because the viewers have told us
Speaker:that that is not an acceptable use of that style. So I
Speaker:certainly wouldn't say replace 100% of your human presenters with AI avatars.
Speaker:But like I said earlier, I'd say know your video message, know your audience,
Speaker:and basically proceed within reason. It's,
Speaker:there's a comedian out there. I won't go into the whole story, but I'll rephrase.
Speaker:One of the things that he would say and make it for this is like,
Speaker:don't go avatar ing where you don't need no avatar in. Right? Like,
Speaker:just don't, don't, don't go there. I,
Speaker:I think there's, there's, like I mentioned at the kind of the opening, there are
Speaker:people who are very skeptical and maybe hesitant
Speaker:about avatars. And, and I love the advice, like if you have the means, you
Speaker:have the kind of go ahead to try. But
Speaker:anything specific out there for those people who are maybe saying no, I,
Speaker:I'm negative towards these. I don't. Why would I want to use them
Speaker:that we might. I. Look, I'm not trying to shift anyone's opinion here. We're not
Speaker:trying to make giant waves, but I'm curious that it's a new technology, looks like
Speaker:it has some potential. So what would we say to those folks who are a
Speaker:little bit still on that, who are on that negative side? I
Speaker:would kind of think about why they're skeptical. I'd say is it because they have
Speaker:a mistrust of AI in general. There's kind of a sentiment towards that just in
Speaker:culture today. Or is it because they have seen
Speaker:videos where the AI avatar is terrible and it turned them off
Speaker:from a video? So I think it's important to stay up to date on
Speaker:what avatars look like and how far they have advanced to look human like,
Speaker:as well as understanding basically what AI avatars can and cannot do.
Speaker:As I mentioned with the particular types of videos earlier, you cannot replace
Speaker:or you should not replace an AI avatar for a sensitive
Speaker:or personal or, you know, small group video. But if
Speaker:you're making a, you know, an instructional video that
Speaker:primarily has a lot of screen content and you're looking
Speaker:for something to provide a little visual interest or help engage
Speaker:your viewers a little bit more, our research shows that viewers would be accepting of
Speaker:an AI avatar in that situation. So if that's the type of video you're creating,
Speaker:I think you have more leeway in terms of trying to include that in
Speaker:your videos, but not on the alternative. As I mentioned, personal,
Speaker:sensitive, you know, human touch. Don't do it.
Speaker:Yeah, absolutely, Absolutely. Okay, so we've covered a lot
Speaker:of research and again, it's out there on the TechSmith blog. I'm curious,
Speaker:any questions that let's say we're looking at doing this again?
Speaker:I hope we do. I hope we look at some other kind of related
Speaker:areas. But any questions you'd want to try to answer if
Speaker:and when you get a chance to do research again? Yeah, I
Speaker:think the first thing is I would like to try and kind of compare these
Speaker:videos to each other. Now I mentioned we did not do that in the study.
Speaker:We had them watch one video and answer the questions. But I'd like to kind
Speaker:of play around with trying to have them watch maybe a human
Speaker:full screen and a human pip video and, you know, use that high
Speaker:quality voice and kind of have them rate them versus each other
Speaker:and kind of look at different aspects of that, whether, you know, we already talked
Speaker:about learning, retention, maybe engagement, you know, which one do they feel
Speaker:is more professional so that we can kind of evaluate one versus the other.
Speaker:I'd also like to dig a little bit more deeper on engagement. We did not
Speaker:really talk very much about engagement in this survey at all. But that
Speaker:is primarily the focus of the video viewer study, which we did at the end
Speaker:of 2024. So probably what my dream state would be would to
Speaker:rerun this study but include a ton of metrics about engagement
Speaker:and have them, you know, do multiple Videos versus each other, human versus
Speaker:AI engagement, professionalism, quality, and probably be a
Speaker:mega study. I don't know if my stakeholders will go for that because that seems
Speaker:like a really big project. But I think it would be cool to kind of
Speaker:mix those two and make one big study. Well, you've got my
Speaker:support. Not that that means much, but I love the research
Speaker:that you've done. And Stephanie, I think that
Speaker:the thing that's really interesting to me about this is that one, we are in
Speaker:this new era of this new technology that it is still a very
Speaker:wide open, we don't know what we don't know kind of space.
Speaker:And I'm. And I think there's a lot to learn and lot to understand.
Speaker:So I'm grateful that you were willing to dive in. You and Troy
Speaker:Stein really spearheaded this. And I'm just
Speaker:blown away that it gives me at least something, at least for now,
Speaker:knowing that in all of its imperfections, all the questions it doesn't answer because
Speaker:that's good research. It never answers all the questions. It just creates more questions.
Speaker:Typically. I love that it gives me at least a little bit of
Speaker:guidance and direction because I'll be honest, I was a little
Speaker:skeptical of avatars. And this has given me a little bit of that
Speaker:impetus to feel like, yeah, I can, I can try doing that. I should try
Speaker:using those a little bit more to see what's going to be most effective, particularly
Speaker:on those repeatable things that change often because that's, you know,
Speaker:if you got me, I can't record the same video a year
Speaker:from now and have it look and feel the same. But an avatar, pretty sure
Speaker:I can get them to be the same. So. Well, Stephanie, before
Speaker:we go into our closing, anything else that we missed or didn't cover
Speaker:that we should talk about for avatars? Probably
Speaker:not the only my last kind of final two things I like to think about
Speaker:is if you're interested in using AI avatar in video, my
Speaker:advice would be to do some research and stay up to date on
Speaker:what you can and, you know, what's out there and what's available for you. Matt,
Speaker:as you mentioned, it's moving so fast that probably the research you've done
Speaker:on Avatars 2 months ago is now may of date.
Speaker:So try and immerse yourself if you want to use it. Make sure you can
Speaker:understand how high quality they can be or, you know, what you want to include
Speaker:in your video. And my other piece of advice, as we learned from the study,
Speaker:is they are not applicable to all videos so make sure that you
Speaker:know your message and you know your audience and you choose what is
Speaker:appropriate for that video versus either, you know, going all in. We
Speaker:would not necessarily recommend that. All right, well, thank you,
Speaker:Stephanie. And so if people want to get involved in TechSmith research, we gave this
Speaker:link last episode, but I think it's helpful to do it again. And where, where
Speaker:can people connect with you and TechSmith Research? Sure.
Speaker:So you can connect with me through my personal LinkedIn page, Stephanie Warnhoff.
Speaker:Or if you are interested in more research at TechSmith, you can
Speaker:send an email to our research email address, which is just
Speaker:researchexmith.com we can get you signed up for,
Speaker:you know, in depth interviews, for beta programs, for receiving some
Speaker:surveys like this in the future. We have a lot of different research opportunities, so
Speaker:emailing that email address and we'll basically get you on the list, so.
Speaker:Perfect. Well, as we like to end most shows, Stephanie, we'd love
Speaker:to hear from you on your final take. So Stephanie Warhol, what
Speaker:is your final take? So my final take is that
Speaker:in using AI avatars in your videos, you really need to know your audience
Speaker:and know your purpose of your video. So if you are creating a video that
Speaker:is long, instructional screen based, it's okay
Speaker:to have some flexibility to try and add an AI avatar. But if you're creating
Speaker:a personal or sensitive or small team
Speaker:recording, just an update, it's not appropriate to replace a human presenter with
Speaker:AI avatars. So make sure that you know your audience, know your message
Speaker:and act appropriately in your videos. Perfect. Well,
Speaker:thank you, Stephanie. Thanks for the great research. Awesome. Thank you very much,
Speaker:Matt. You bet. All right everybody, if you're looking for
Speaker:AI avatars, also just recommend go try TechSmith
Speaker:Audio Camtasia Audit. It's got so many great cool features with the app. Got the
Speaker:avatars, you can try those. You got the new 11 lab voices which sounds so
Speaker:good. Hard to believe that they are AI. I can see why people
Speaker:maybe said that's not AI, that's a real person. So go check those out. You
Speaker:can try it for free. Or if you are using Camtasia, there's a
Speaker:bunch of audio features that are available to you. The AI features are at the
Speaker:higher level though, of course. But with that said, you know, part of this, why
Speaker:we bring forth this research is to help you get better, make better decisions, think
Speaker:through creating critically about what's going to make for good instruction, what's going to make
Speaker:for good video. And of course in doing that process, you got to just keep
Speaker:working at it. Keep trying and keep exploring and keep trying to get better
Speaker:every single day. And with that said, I hope you take a little time
Speaker:to level up every single day. Thanks, everybody.
